The article goes farther when he says that John was "gunned down in an accidental shooting at a fast food restaurant's bathroom." Moreover, he says "his age was not immediately known." By describing the toilet as a person with the word "his" rather than using "it", I assumed that a person really was shot while using the toilet at a Carl's Jr.
In addition to personifying the toilet, the employees at Carl's Jr. had a life like memorial service for John that included flowers and the first 50 patrons that entered the restaurant received bottle of John's favorite toilet bowl cleaner, "Kaboom Bowl Blaster."
Although a clever marketing ploy for the restaurant, the Associated Press should have done a better job of clarifying that John was not actually a real person. They could have easily accomplished this by using a picture of a shattered toilet. Likewise, by not personifying "John" so much.
John is clearly defined as a toilet in the dateline, so I don't have a problem with the purposeful treatment of the toilet as a real person. I do, however, have a problem with the sentence, "A Bountiful flower shop provided a large floral arrangement." Is "A Bountiful" the name of the shop? Is the flower shop bountiful? It's confusing and possibly a typo.
ReplyDeleteI have a general problem with this story. I realize that everyone has their weird news story that needs a certain tone but I'm annoyed by this story and that it wasted my time. On a not so negative note, the picture is cool!
ReplyDelete