Rather, than covering the topics discussed by the G-20, Pershing discusses how Obama gave Queen Elizabeth II an ipod. The article also discusses how Michelle Obama "breached royal protocol" by touching the queen's back. Obama is everywhere-- the cover of People Magazine, "60 Minutes," "Jay Leno," etc. No other president has been so informal with the media. But is he too informal? Is he too much of a celebrity, that people are not criticizing his presidency like they should? With Obama's first 100 days in office close to being over, what does America really know about Obama's political agenda?
Unfortunately, most American's know that the Obama girls are getting a dog, possibly to be named "Moose,". Now, Americans are aware that Obama gave the queen an iPod. Who cares? The answer is tragically enough, a lot of Americans. Otherwise these frivolous, unimportant articles would have stopped being written.
Steve Jobs, CEO of Apple, should look into having Obama do an iPod commercial. It could be named the "G-20 iPod" and even feature a cameo of the new "First dog,". Obama might be game for the commercial, since he certainly seems to have the time for People and "Leno"; why not Jobs as well?
Like several of your peers, you raise questions about newsworthiness. What responsibility does the media have to publish news that matters? Is it all about news that sells?
ReplyDeleteYour article is a classic example of how news institutions have to balance giving readers what they need and giving readers what they want. No, Obama shouldn't be Brad Pitt, but the sad fact is: he kind of is a movie star. Especially as politicians (and news organizations) try to draw in the younger, supposedly disillusioned, crowd, they increasingly try to pander to the gossip-hungry mob. I understand with your irrelevancy argument, but I also understand news organizations' need to boost circulation.
ReplyDeleteEDIT: I understand *and agree* with your irrelevancy argument, but I also understand news organizations' need to boost circulation.
ReplyDelete